3 Min readArticle07 Apr 2025
Gold and Bitcoin Decouple. What's Driving the Divergence?
At a Glance
From November 2022 to November 2024, gold and bitcoin moved in a relatively tight correlation, with gold gaining 67% while the more volatile bitcoin surged nearly 400%. Analysts widely believed that the two assets would continue to move in tandem, given their shared status as hedges against weak global currency policies. However, this relationship began to fray in 2025. As of late March, gold has risen 16%, while bitcoin has fallen by more than 6%.
To understand this divergence, it is essential to examine the distinct factors influencing each asset.
Bitcoin's Rise and Recent Pullback
Bitcoin's meteoric rise over the past three years can be attributed to growing institutional adoption. Major participants such as BlackRock, VanEck and Fidelity have increased their exposure to the cryptocurrency market, while countries like El Salvador have embraced bitcoin as a key financial tool.
The U.S. government has also unveiled preliminary plans for a strategic crypto reserve, further solidifying bitcoin's position. The introduction of new financial instruments, such as CME Group’s Bitcoin Friday futures, which offer contracts as small as 1/50th of a coin, has made it easier for retail investors to participate in the crypto market. These developments have not only driven up demand but also enhanced bitcoin's durability through broader institutional entrenchment.
However, the recent weakness in bitcoin can be attributed to two primary factors. First, much of the positive news that fueled its rise had already been priced in by the time bitcoin reached its peak of $109,000 in mid-January. The adage "buy the rumor, sell the fact" often holds true in financial markets, where speculators buy into an asset ahead of anticipated news and then sell once the news is confirmed. This can lead to a simultaneous rush to liquidate long positions, driving the asset's price in the opposite direction.
Second, bitcoin retains a strong correlation with the Nasdaq, a relationship that remains confounding to many traders but easily explained by others. Many institutional trading desks often group volatile assets like the Nasdaq and bitcoin into the same portfolio, assuming a Nasdaq traders’ expertise in handling volatility equips them to manage bitcoin’s price swings. Consequently, a sharp decline in the Nasdaq often triggers sales of bitcoin to cover margin requirements.
Gold's Resurgence
The recent strength in gold, on the other hand, can be attributed to a combination of economic uncertainty, rising inflation expectations and a shift in central bank policies.
Economic uncertainty has traditionally pushed investors toward gold as a safe haven, a trend that has clearly gained traction. Additionally, the Federal Reserve's potential shift toward easing monetary policy, rather than tightening, has further bolstered gold's appeal. However, a key driver of gold's recent performance is the unprecedented rate at which global central banks, particularly those in China, India and Russia, have been stockpiling the metal. According to the World Gold Council, these central banks have been purchasing over 1,000 metric tons of gold annually over the past three years.
This accumulation reflects a strategic move away from holding reserves solely in U.S. dollars – a response to actions taken following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which froze dollar-denominated assets and excluded Russia from the SWIFT payment network. This shift may have accelerated in recent months due to perceived adversarial U.S. trade and tariff policies, prompting key trading partners to diversify their reserve instruments. While the change is modest, it is significant: the share of dollar reserves among global central banks has dropped from over 60% in 2022 to 57% today.
Moreover, gold's strength may be partly a result of bitcoin's weakness. The total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies, estimated at around $2.8 trillion, has pulled money away from the more traditional dollar hedge of gold. It would stand to reason that if bitcoin was in a period of weakness, perhaps investors seeking safety and stability might turn to gold, which has a history spanning thousands of years as a reliable store of value.
The Maturation of Bitcoin
One aspect that cannot be overlooked is the historical context of the two assets. Gold has been a store of value since ancient Egypt in 4000 BC, while Bitcoin's history dates back only to 2011. Many argue that Bitcoin still has a long way to go before it can be considered a mature asset on par with gold. However, others contend that Bitcoin's rapid development in the digital age is unprecedented and that it is maturing at an accelerated pace.
The recent divergence between gold and bitcoin highlights the complex interplay of economic, political and market forces. While both assets are seen as hedges against uncertainty, their distinct drivers and historical contexts have led to a breakdown in their previously tight correlation.
OpenMarkets is an online magazine and blog focused on global markets and economic trends. It combines feature articles, news briefs and videos with contributions from leaders in business, finance and economics in an interactive forum designed to foster conversation around the issues and ideas shaping our industry.
All examples are hypothetical interpretations of situations and are used for explanation purposes only. The views expressed in OpenMarkets articles reflect solely those of their respective authors and not necessarily those of CME Group or its affiliated institutions. OpenMarkets and the information herein should not be considered investment advice or the results of actual market experience. Neither futures trading nor swaps trading are suitable for all investors, and each involves the risk of loss. Swaps trading should only be undertaken by investors who are Eligible Contract Participants (ECPs) within the meaning of Section 1a(18) of the Commodity Exchange Act. Futures and swaps each are leveraged investments and, because only a percentage of a contract’s value is required to trade, it is possible to lose more than the amount of money deposited for either a futures or swaps position. Therefore, traders should only use funds that they can afford to lose without affecting their lifestyles and only a portion of those funds should be devoted to any one trade because traders cannot expect to profit on every trade. BrokerTec Americas LLC (“BAL”) is a registered broker-dealer with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (www.FINRA.org), and is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (www.SIPC.org). BAL does not provide services to private or retail customers.. In the United Kingdom, BrokerTec Europe Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. CME Amsterdam B.V. is regulated in the Netherlands by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) (www.AFM.nl). CME Investment Firm B.V. is also incorporated in the Netherlands and regulated by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM), as well as the Central Bank of the Netherlands (DNB).