The 2024 U.S. presidential election is now a few months away, and the candidates have all but been solidified in what will likely be the second iteration of President Joe Biden running against former President Donald Trump.
Traders tend to conflate their political bias, or a certain election result, as being “better” for the stock market over the next four years. While different presidential regimes may institute different policies that affect businesses and the economy, the stock market has proven to be upward sloping regardless of the party in office and more reactionary to economic data and global geopolitical uncertainty than domestic politics.
According to an analysis by Saugatuck Financial, Democrats tend to be elected during recession years more often than Republicans. However, after removing the six election years where recessions occurred, average S&P 500 returns were very similar for Democrats and Republicans.
Market Response to Past Elections
The market’s generally agnostic attitudes toward the results of presidential elections creates opportunities for traders, and specifically options traders, to take a view on market conditions and buy or sell volatility in the months leading up to the election.
The unique and unprecedented challenge that COVID-19 presented to the world in 2020 meant that in terms of market trends near presidential elections, 2020 was more of an aberration than another correlated data point. However, it did still provide a similar theme to other election years – in the months leading up to the election, equity, commodity and bond market volatility was heightened.
CME Group Volatility Index (CVOL)
For CME Group products, this can be visualized through CVOL in the treasury and metals markets. Isolating the 30-year bond and gold, volatility spiked in the period just before and after the 2016 and 2020 elections.
Specifically, the three months leading up to a presidential election and the week or two post-election have experienced above average volatility. By a month or so following an election, volatility has typically normalized, likely because the uncertainty of the election results is no longer present.
Trading Volatility with Equity Options
Traders can take a position on volatility in the equity space by buying volatility or buying options a few months in advance of the election. This can be done with no directional market bias by purchasing both a call and a put option in the E-mini S&P 500 or E-mini Nasdaq-100.
The risk to this type of position, known as a straddle (same option strike) or strangle (different option strikes, typically both out of the money), is that as time progresses, the value of these options could decrease if volatility doesn’t increase. If volatility stays flat or decreases, one methodology that I personally have used is to sell the same strike options that have an earlier expiration date. This allows the opportunity to “roll out” the short options to sell other ones against the purchased ones. This type of strategy is called a “calendar/diagonal” or “time spread.”
The value to this type of position is that since the longer dated options have more volatility sensitivity (known as vega) than the shorter ones, as volatility potentially increases the value of the position also increases. Many traders feel safe moving to cash until after the election but attempting to time the market can lead to missed opportunities. Buying volatility can provide a different alternative to some traders who choose to move to defensive assets like cash, because they are still invested in the market but can potentially profit off the uncertainty and sharp movements that may occur.
While markets are typically influenced more by inflation, interest rates and geopolitical uncertainty, there are still opportunities for traders to take a view on volatility leading up to the election.
OpenMarkets is an online magazine and blog focused on global markets and economic trends. It combines feature articles, news briefs and videos with contributions from leaders in business, finance and economics in an interactive forum designed to foster conversation around the issues and ideas shaping our industry.
All examples are hypothetical interpretations of situations and are used for explanation purposes only. The views expressed in OpenMarkets articles reflect solely those of their respective authors and not necessarily those of CME Group or its affiliated institutions. OpenMarkets and the information herein should not be considered investment advice or the results of actual market experience. Neither futures trading nor swaps trading are suitable for all investors, and each involves the risk of loss. Swaps trading should only be undertaken by investors who are Eligible Contract Participants (ECPs) within the meaning of Section 1a(18) of the Commodity Exchange Act. Futures and swaps each are leveraged investments and, because only a percentage of a contract’s value is required to trade, it is possible to lose more than the amount of money deposited for either a futures or swaps position. Therefore, traders should only use funds that they can afford to lose without affecting their lifestyles and only a portion of those funds should be devoted to any one trade because traders cannot expect to profit on every trade. BrokerTec Americas LLC (“BAL”) is a registered broker-dealer with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (www.FINRA.org), and is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (www.SIPC.org). BAL does not provide services to private or retail customers.. In the United Kingdom, BrokerTec Europe Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. CME Amsterdam B.V. is regulated in the Netherlands by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) (www.AFM.nl). CME Investment Firm B.V. is also incorporated in the Netherlands and regulated by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM), as well as the Central Bank of the Netherlands (DNB).