Figure 1: Forex reserves in GBP are a quarter of those in EUR and 1/15 those in USD

Figure 1: Forex reserves in GBP are a quarter of those in EUR and 1/15 those in USD

Together, a moon and a planet have a common center of gravity, but being larger, the planet’s gravity has a greater influence on the behavior of the system.  Within Europe, the eurozone’s GDP amounts to $11.8 trillion, compared with $3.1 trillion for the U.K.  Their relative size is also reflected in trade flows: 44% of U.K. exports head to the eurozone, but only 16% of eurozone exports head to the U.K. 

As such, perhaps its not surprising that EURUSD and GBPUSD exhibit both a strong co-movement (Figure 2), and have had a consistently positive one-year-rolling correlation since 1980 (Figure 3).  When EUR rises or falls versus USD, it often pulls the pound along with it.  The pound exerts some influence on EUR as well. However, the relative size of the two currency areas in terms of GDP, trade flows and central bank reserves is not equal, so GBP’s influence on EUR tends to be weaker than EUR’s influence on GBP. This much was evident in the aftermath of the 2016 Brexit referendum when the pound plunged 20% versus USD over a three-month period while EUR fell only a few percent. 

Figure 2: EUR and GBP tend to track one another versus USD

Figure 2: EUR and GBP tend to track one another versus USD

Figure 3: GBP and EUR have had a positive one-year rolling correlation for the past 40 years

Figure 3: GBP and EUR have had a positive one-year rolling correlation for the past 40 years

Oil and GBP

While GBPUSD may revolve around EUR to some extent, its orbit is an eccentric one that varies over time.  Over the past several decades one British pound has bought anywhere from 1.7 euros (or at times more) on the high side to as little as 1.1 (or occasionally fewer) euros on the low side.  Aside from having its own separate monetary and fiscal policy, the U.K. has one thing that the eurozone has never had: a significant quantity of domestically produced oil, thanks to the discovery and exploitation of North Sea crude. 

When it comes to oil, the U.K. differs from the U.S. as well.  Although the U.S. is also a large oil producer, before 2020 it was a net oil importer. And before the advent of large-scale fracking circa-2008, U.S. imported roughly as much crude oil as Europe.

By contrast, from 1981 to 2005 the U.K. was a net oil exporter (Figure 4).  Since 2006, the U.K. has been a  net oil importer, but its oil imports are much smaller than those of the eurozone.  The U.K.’s North Sea oil production peaked in 1999 and steadily shrank until 2015 before stabilizing and increasing slightly during the past six years.  The shrinkage and subsequent stabilization of the oil production explains to some extent GBP’s decline versus EUR (Figure 5).  

Figure 4: The U.K. has often been a net oil exporter in contrast to Europe

Figure 4: The U.K. has often been a net oil exporter in contrast to Europe

Figure 5: Declining North Sea oil production may have weighed on the GBPEUR

Figure 6: Since 2000s, and especially in 2008, GBPUSD often moved with WTI

Brexit and GBP

Figure 7: Brexit politics has played a major role in GBPUSD over the past six years

Figure 8: Pre-Brexit GBP options often traded at lower implied volatilities than EUR options

GBPUSD and the Four Major Macro Forces

Figure 9: With exception to the 2015-19 period, U.K. and U.S. fiscal policy has moved in tandem

Figure 10: U.K. versus U.S. fiscal policy has done a poor job of explaining GBPUSD variation

Figure 11: Size of U.K. trade deficit has varied more than that of the U.S.

Figure 12: Relative trade picture explains some of the variation in GBPUSD

Figure 13: Anticipated future interest rate differentials correlate strongly with GBPUSD

Figure 14: Investors anticipate a faster lift off of U.K. rates than in the U.S.

What the Commitment of Traders (COT) Report Tell Us About Positioning

Figure 15: Commitment of traders report suggests a recent lack of commitment on GBPUSD